Timely Filing Limit Expired
The claim was received by the payer after the deadline allowed in the plan/contract (or, for Medicare, after the 12-month statutory limit), so it is being denied for lateness rather than for any clinical or cod…
Guided troubleshooter available for this denial
Answer a few questions to reach the correct disposition. No patient or claim identifiers requested.
In plain language
The claim was received by the payer after the deadline allowed in the plan/contract (or, for Medicare, after the 12-month statutory limit), so it is being denied for lateness rather than for any clinical or coding reason.
Start here
Confirm the actual date of service and the payer's specific timely-filing limit.
Who resolves it
Billing/Denials Follow-Up
Who prevents it
Health Information Management/Coding (charge-lag reduction) and Patient Financial Services (workqueue aging controls).
How to resolve this denial, step by step
- 1
Confirm the actual date of service and the payer's specific timely-filing limit.
- 2
Gather proof of original timely submission (acceptance report, transmission log).
- 3
If proof of timely submission exists, submit that proof to the payer as a claim- status/processing dispute rather than a new appeal.
- 4
If genuinely late, determine whether a recognized exception applies (for Medicare: administrative error, retroactive Medicare entitlement, retroactive MA/PACE disenrollment) and gather the required documentation.
- 5
If no exception applies, the claim is closed as a write-off; per Medicare policy, a claim denied solely for untimely filing is not an appealable initial determination.
- 6
Document the timely-filing analysis and root cause.
- 7
Escalate to Patient Financial Services/leadership if the delay traces to an internal process failure requiring workflow redesign.
Then choose the correct disposition
Payer follow-up (proof of timely submission)
when the claim was actually submitted on time but the payer's received-date record is wrong.
Compliance/administrative-error exception request
Medicare only, and only under the specific regulatory categories.
Write-off/contractual adjustment
the typical outcome when no proof of timely submission or valid exception exists.
Formal appeal
under Medicare rules, a denial based solely on untimely filing is generally not subject to the standard appeals process; verify current payer-specific rules before advising otherwise.
Stop and escalate when
- Internal system or process failure caused the delay (compliance-relevant); a Medicare regulatory exception category may apply and needs contractor-level review; payer disputes proof of timely submission.
What Needs to Be Corrected
- Claim correction: Generally none — a true timely-filing denial is not fixed by editing claim data.
- Upstream correction: The workflow that delayed submission (charge-lag, coding backlog, eligibility-verification delay) must be fixed to prevent recurrence; for Medicare, an exception request requires documented proof of one of the specific regulatory exceptions.
Do Not Do This
- Do not bill the Medicare patient for services denied solely as untimely filed, except for the deductible/coinsurance that would have applied had the claim been paid, when the beneficiary was not responsible for the delay.
- Do not backdate a claim submission record.